Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels

From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 11:11:41 EDT

  • Next message: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan: "Re: Major Defect in Combining Classes of Tibetan Vowels"

    From: "Andrew C. West" <>

    > What I'm suggesting is that although "cui" <0F45, 0F74, 0F72> and "ciu"
    > 0F72, 0F74> should be rendered identically, the logical ordering of the
    > codepoints representing the vowels may represent lexical differences that
    > be lost during the process of normalisation.

    Do you (or does anyone) have an actual example where this is the case? It
    may well be true but until someone has a proof there is not really an
    indication of a specific problem for the UTC to address.

    The current discussion is like arguing about a color that none of the
    participants have ever seen.


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 12:23:00 EDT