From: Peter Lofting (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 12:08:10 EDT
At 8:11 AM -0700 6/25/03, Michael (michka) Kaplan wrote:
>From: "Andrew C. West" <email@example.com>
> > What I'm suggesting is that although "cui" <0F45, 0F74, 0F72> and
>> 0F72, 0F74> should be rendered identically, the logical ordering of the
> > codepoints representing the vowels may represent lexical
>differences that would
>> be lost during the process of normalisation.
>Do you (or does anyone) have an actual example where this is the case? It
>may well be true but until someone has a proof there is not really an
>indication of a specific problem for the UTC to address.
>The current discussion is like arguing about a color that none of the
>participants have ever seen.
A list of common contractions would help here. I've seen at least one
such published collection in the past which listed common
contractions found in U-Med running text. However I don't have it
with me. Does anyone on-line have access to a document like this?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 13:47:46 EDT