Re: Revised N2586R

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Wed Jun 25 2003 - 12:11:39 EDT

  • Next message: Doug Ewell: "Re: Revised N2586R"

    At 08:44 -0700 2003-06-25, Doug Ewell wrote:

    >If it's true that either the UTC or WG2 has formally approved the
    >character, for a future version of Unicode or a future amendment to
    >10646, then I don't see any reason why font makers can't PRODUCE a font
    >with a glyph for the proposed character at the proposed code point.
    >They just can't DISTRIBUTE the font until the appropriate standard is

    That's correct.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Jun 25 2003 - 13:01:02 EDT