From: Pim Blokland (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 10:09:53 EDT
Michael Everson schreef:
> I think the answer is, regarding the soft dot property, please
> the ij ligature alone.
And I think not.
When putting accents on the ĳ (which does happen!), the dots must
go. Simple as that.
Maybe it was a bad idea to include ĳ as a character in Unicode at
all, but now it's there, there's no reason to ignore it when
refining the rules, to deprecate it practically.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 11:22:23 EDT