Re: Accented ij ligatures (was: Unicode Public Review Issues update)

From: Pim Blokland (pblokland@planet.nl)
Date: Tue Jul 01 2003 - 10:09:53 EDT

  • Next message: Stefan Persson: "Re: Accented ij ligatures"

    Michael Everson schreef:

    > I think the answer is, regarding the soft dot property, please
    leave
    > the ij ligature alone.

    And I think not.
    When putting accents on the ij (which does happen!), the dots must
    go. Simple as that.
    Maybe it was a bad idea to include ij as a character in Unicode at
    all, but now it's there, there's no reason to ignore it when
    refining the rules, to deprecate it practically.

    Pim Blokland

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 01 2003 - 11:22:23 EDT