Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician

From: Karljürgen Feuerherm (cuneiform@rogers.com)
Date: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 17:09:24 EDT

  • Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: Ligatures in Turkish and Azeri"

    Yes it is, except that one (tradionally puts a 'breve') over 'u' to help in
    differentiating; and actually, the inter-char spacing is not quite *that*
    regular....

    K
    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "James H. Cloos Jr." <cloos@jhcloos.com>
    To: <unicode@unicode.org>
    Sent: Tuesday, July 15, 2003 3:39 PM
    Subject: Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician

    > |> At 08:42 -0400 2003-07-15, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote:
    >
    > >> Most German people I know can't read the German cursive script used
    > >> say 50 years ago. But the characters clearly correspond to the
    > >> Latin characters in use today.
    >
    > Is that the script where minimum comes out looking like:
    >
    > /\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
    >
    > (Ie, m => /\/\/\, n => /\/\, u => /\/\, i => /\ ?)
    >
    > NB how the i is dotless. (I can just see the [useless] debate
    > of whether that should then be encoded as U+0069 or U+0131. :)
    >
    > -JimC
    >
    >
    >



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 15 2003 - 17:48:22 EDT