Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Previous message: Thomas M. Widmann: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- In reply to: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Next in thread: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Karljürgen Feuerherm: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Patrick Andries: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
|> At 08:42 -0400 2003-07-15, Karljürgen Feuerherm wrote:
>> Most German people I know can't read the German cursive script used
>> say 50 years ago. But the characters clearly correspond to the
>> Latin characters in use today.
Is that the script where minimum comes out looking like:
/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\/\
(Ie, m => /\/\/\, n => /\/\, u => /\/\, i => /\ ?)
NB how the i is dotless. (I can just see the [useless] debate
of whether that should then be encoded as U+0069 or U+0131. :)
-JimC
- Next message: Michael Everson: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Previous message: Thomas M. Widmann: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- In reply to: Winkler, Arnold F: "RE: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Next in thread: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Werner LEMBERG: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Karljürgen Feuerherm: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Reply: Patrick Andries: "Re: Aramaic, Samaritan, Phoenician"
- Messages sorted by:
[ date ]
[ thread ]
[ subject ]
[ author ]
[ attachment ]
- Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5
: Tue Jul 15 2003 - 16:13:30 EDT