Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools

Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 17:35:52 EDT

  • Next message: Karljürgen Feuerherm: "Re: Back to Hebrew -holem-waw vs waw-holem"

    >>There may be very good reasons for encoding holem-waw as
    other than a holem followed by a waw.

    I agree, but I don't think we have options other than holem first or holem
    last. In SIL Ezra, we encoded
     the entire holem-waw as a single glyph - a vowel. But then found out later
    there was disagreement
    about whether one could *know* if a waw with a holem above it really was a
    consonant or a vowel.
    Is this your concern?

    Joan Wardell

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 28 2003 - 18:15:56 EDT