Date: Mon Jul 28 2003 - 17:35:52 EDT
>>There may be very good reasons for encoding holem-waw as
other than a holem followed by a waw.
I agree, but I don't think we have options other than holem first or holem
last. In SIL Ezra, we encoded
the entire holem-waw as a single glyph - a vowel. But then found out later
there was disagreement
about whether one could *know* if a waw with a holem above it really was a
consonant or a vowel.
Is this your concern?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jul 28 2003 - 18:15:56 EDT