From: Ted Hopp (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 09:27:57 EDT
Thank you, Jony, for taking this discussion to the SII and for bringing the
response back to this group.
Based on the SII response, it sounds like either doing nothing (within
Unicode proper) or developing Ken's CGJ proposal are the leading contenders
at this point.
Also [inre CGJ and ZWNBSP]:
On Friday, July 25, 2003 8:39 PM, Kenneth Whistler wrote:
>...Some further clarifications are in order, since the documentation
>for both of these characters has not quite caught up to the UTC
>decisions regarding them. A lot of work went into the Unicode 4.0
>documentation on these, and the Unicode 4.0 chapters will be posted
>online very soon -- at which point it would be helpful if everyone
>concerned about this issue takes the time to read the latest on
>these characters in particular.
Any schedule on when this "required reading" will be available?
Ted Hopp, Ph.D.
newSLATE is your personal learning workspace
...on the web at http://www.newSLATE.com/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 10:06:27 EDT