From: Peter Kirk (peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com)
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 14:16:34 EDT
On 29/07/2003 10:52, Peter_Constable@sil.org wrote:
>A variation (assuming that canonical ordering does not occur around markup
>tags), might be something like
>
>yerushala<CanonicalOrderingBlock>
>
>
>
>- Peter
>
>
>
>
>
If inserting an otherwise dummy piece of markup in the middle of a
canonical combining sequence does actually reliably inhibit reordering,
this might be interesting. But somehow I would imagine that it
shouldn't. What does W3C have to say about this one? Anyway, within
Unicode we shouldn't assume that any particular form of markup is used.
So I would be surprised if this is a solution to the problem.
-- Peter Kirk peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 15:05:52 EDT