RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew

From: Peter_Constable@sil.org
Date: Tue Jul 29 2003 - 13:37:04 EDT

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"

Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"
In reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Jony Rosenne wrote on 07/29/2003 01:37:00 AM:

> Failing that, it was suggested that an existing Unicode character, such
as
> ZERO WIDTH NO-BREAK SPACE, be used for "invisible" Hebrew letters, in
cases
> such as Yerushala(y)im.

ZWNBSP or any other word-boundary-causing character would give
inappropriate behaviour for certain processes.

- Peter

---------------------------------------------------------------------------
Peter Constable

Non-Roman Script Initiative, SIL International
7500 W. Camp Wisdom Rd., Dallas, TX 75236, USA
Tel: +1 972 708 7485

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"
Previous message: Michael Everson: "Re: Back to Hebrew, was OT:darn'd fools"
In reply to: Jony Rosenne: "RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Next in thread: John Hudson: "RE: Yerushala(y)im - or Biblical Hebrew"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Jul 29 2003 - 14:19:59 EDT