Re: Hebrew Vav Holam

From: Peter Kirk (peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com)
Date: Fri Aug 01 2003 - 05:50:04 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Hebrew Vav Holam"

    On 01/08/2003 00:14, Jony Rosenne wrote:

    >The characters in the block FBxx are deprecated and are not needed. The are
    >equivalent to their decomposed sequence.
    >
    >In Hebrew, there are basically three layers: The letters, which are
    >mandatory, the points, which are optional and indicate vowels and other
    >pronunciation variations, and cantillation marks which are also optional and
    >seldom used.
    >
    >It is possible to use partial pointing, marking only some of the letters.
    >
    >Cantillation marks are used only with the Bible and not always.
    >
    >Some marks are difficult to classify.
    >
    >It should be possible to compare and mix plain Hebrew, without any points
    >and cantillation marks, with pointed or fully marked Hebrew.
    >
    >Thus, there is only one letter Shin, commonly unpointed and representing
    >both Shin and Sin. In pointed text, the Shin and Sin points are added.
    >
    >Jony
    >
    >
    >
    Good point, Jony. One good reason for not using precombined characters
    in Hebrew is that it makes it much easier (even as a font attribute or
    something of the sort) to strip the pointing from a text or ignore all
    points. In an unpointed text holam male is a vav. So that's a good
    reason for it to be a vav plus something in a pointed text.

    -- 
    Peter Kirk
    peter.r.kirk@ntlworld.com
    http://web.onetel.net.uk/~peterkirk/
    


    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Aug 01 2003 - 06:31:01 EDT