RE: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?

From: Kent Karlsson (kentk@cs.chalmers.se)
Date: Tue Aug 05 2003 - 11:48:21 EDT

Next message: James H. Cloos Jr.: "Re: Handwritten EURO sign (off topic?)"

Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Questions on ZWNBS - for line initial holam plus alef"
In reply to: souravm: "RE: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?"
Next in thread: John McConnell: "RE: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

Aren't the replies about Unicode 3.2 (or maybe 4.0) rather than 3.1?

> 1651 - Supplimentary Plane 2 - \2e80 - \u2f00

Plane 2 covers U+20000 to U+2FFFF, and is not in the BMP (= Plane 0).

/kent k

Next message: James H. Cloos Jr.: "Re: Handwritten EURO sign (off topic?)"
Previous message: Kent Karlsson: "RE: Questions on ZWNBS - for line initial holam plus alef"
In reply to: souravm: "RE: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?"
Next in thread: John McConnell: "RE: Does Unicode 3.1 take care of all characters of 'Hong Kong Supplimentary Character Set - 2001' (HKSCS-2001) ?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Aug 05 2003 - 15:01:01 EDT