From: Mark Davis (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Oct 21 2003 - 14:15:39 CST
I don't think it is quite that simple. Look at India, for example.
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "John Cowan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
To: "Mark Davis" <email@example.com>
Sent: Tue, 2003 Oct 21 12:36
Subject: Re: GDP by language
> Mark Davis scripsit:
> > Thus they are rough figures, since different language groups will have
> > distributions of GDP; and there may be significant multilingual populations.
> In fact, officially multilingual countries are less likely to have polyglot
> citizens than officially monolingual ones. The whole point of being
> multilingual, after all, is to allow multiple groups of monoglots to get
> equal access to government services. If most of your citizens are polyglots,
> you may as well choose the language that most of them can speak, even as L2 or
> as the official language.
> John Cowan http://www.ccil.org/~cowan firstname.lastname@example.org
> To say that Bilbo's breath was taken away is no description at all. There are
> no words left to express his staggerment, since Men changed the language that
> they learned of elves in the days when all the world was wonderful. --The
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST