From: Mark E. Shoulson (mark@kli.org)
Date: Sun Oct 26 2003 - 21:45:59 CST
I remembered there was a lot of discussion about this case, which is why
I brought it up. Can someone remind me why ZWNBSP would be Bad for
this? Wrong RTL coding? (possibly, but it's weak, isn't it) Wrongly
indicates a word-break? (this is probably a problem.)
~mark
John Hudson wrote:
> At 04:37 PM 10/26/2003, Jony Rosenne wrote:
>
>> There is nothing unusual about this. The only problem is that while the
>> Hiriq is between the Lamed and the Mem and belongs to the missing
>> Yod, some
>> people insist that they see two vowels under the Lamed.
>
>
> No, the problem is not the positioning of the hiriq, which is easy to
> control, but the re-ordering of the hiriq and patah due to the fact
> that they are in separate combining classes, with the hiriq having a
> lower number. This is 'a claimed problem', and as should be clear from
> much previous discussion, far from everyone agrees with your
> suggestion that the missing Yod be encoded in some way. So this is a
> live issue, and not one that can simply be ignored because you've made
> up your mind what you think the solution should be.
>
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 18 2007 - 15:54:24 CST