From: Doug Ewell (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Nov 05 2003 - 14:03:15 EST
Addison Phillips [wM] <aphillips at webmethods dot com> wrote:
>> I assume that by “multiple UTF-8 sequences that could represent the
>> same logical text,” Adobe is referring to non-shortest UTF-8
>> sequences such as <C0 80> and not to Unicode canonical equivalences
>> or something else. No similar warning about “multiple sequences” is
>> given in the sections that deal with UTF-16.
> I am under the impression that they mean combining sequences.
That would be good, but then I wonder why they phrased the issue in
terms of UTF-8 rather than Unicode generally.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 05 2003 - 18:21:56 EST