From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Nov 07 2003 - 07:19:47 EST
At 10:34 +0000 2003-11-07, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>I'm still concerned about the SHRII ligature encoding, though.
>Of course, it makes sense to treat the ligature as a conjunct
>of SHA + RA + II, but since SA + RA + II seems to have been
>the "official" way to encode the ligature -- the proposed
>change will break existing implementations.
That's the price of disunification. But it's the right thing to do.
>It might be best to add the new SHA character without changing
>the existing SHRII encoding (SA + RA + II).
That would be incorrect, however.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Nov 07 2003 - 08:01:08 EST