From: Philippe Verdy (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Nov 20 2003 - 11:11:15 EST
I note that the current definition of Hangul syllable sequences uses an ambiguous regular expression, where two alternates can be used to match the expression. Also its analysis in a top-down parser will use backward fallbacks to try the alternates.
$Hangul_Sequence = ((($L+ $LV?) | ($L* $LV)) $V* $T*) | ($L* $LVT $T*);
This is more visible if written like this:
$Hangul_Sequence = ( ( ($L+ $LV?)
| ($L* $LV )
) $V* $T*)
| ( $L* $LVT $T*);
Some remarks about this expression:
- See the first two lines for the ambiguous alternates when trying to match a string with form ($L+ $LV).
- See how the trailing $T* can be factorized for the first alternate (first three lines) and the second alternate (last line).
- See how it's also impossible to discriminate these first two alternatives after reading just a string starting with $L+.
- It is only deterministic after reading a string starting by $LV or $LVT.
A better regular expression without this problem (for faster performance in non-deterministic automatas) is:
$Hangul_Sequence = ($L+ ( ($LVT $T*)
| ($LV $V* $T*)
| ( $V* $T*)
| ($LVT $T*)
| ($LV $V* $T*);
This regular expression, which matches exactly the same "language" becomes fully determinist.
If one wants to include the factorisation of trailing $T* (which may just reduce the number of states in non optimizing regular expression engines, but does not benefit really to performance), this one works as well:
$Hangul_Sequence = ( ($L+ ( $LVT
| ($LV $V*)
| ($LV $V*)
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Nov 20 2003 - 12:13:27 EST