From: Doug Ewell (email@example.com)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 14:18:14 EST
Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:
> I'm not convinced that there's a significant improvement when only
> checking for noramlization but not perfomring it. It requires at least
> a list of the characters are acceptable in a normalization form, and
> as well their combining classes.
UAX #15 begs to differ. See Annex 8, "Detecting Normalization Forms":
In particular, the list of characters and derived properties, while
large, is *much* smaller than the complete UCD.
I have not tested this, and don't currently plan to.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 14:59:25 EST