From: Mark Davis (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Tue Nov 25 2003 - 14:42:42 EST
On my home page I have a link to a brief paper on minimal size for an NFC
http://www.macchiato.com/, see Normalization Footprint
It was for Unicode 3.0, but the sizes shouldn't have changed much since then. It
would add a bit of extra code for supplementaries.
► शिष्यादिच्छेत्पराजयम् ◄
----- Original Message -----
From: "Doug Ewell" <email@example.com>
To: "Unicode Mailing List" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Cc: <email@example.com>; "John Cowan" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
Sent: Tue, 2003 Nov 25 11:18
Subject: Re: Normalisation stability, was: Compression through normalization
> Philippe Verdy <verdy underscore p at wanadoo dot fr> wrote:
> > I'm not convinced that there's a significant improvement when only
> > checking for noramlization but not perfomring it. It requires at least
> > a list of the characters are acceptable in a normalization form, and
> > as well their combining classes.
> UAX #15 begs to differ. See Annex 8, "Detecting Normalization Forms":
> In particular, the list of characters and derived properties, while
> large, is *much* smaller than the complete UCD.
> I have not tested this, and don't currently plan to.
> -Doug Ewell
> Fullerton, California
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Nov 25 2003 - 15:31:41 EST