From: Arcane Jill (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 05:12:16 EST
That is almost precisely what I said. You repeated it perfectly. Thanks.
But actually, there is one small difference between what I said and what
you said. I merely /observed/ that no characters have different non-null
values for the various number-related properties. But you state
(emphasis on *cannot*) that this is guaranteed. Please confirm - is
there a hard-coded /guarantee/ that no character will ever be added in
the future for which the various number-related properties will have
different non-null values? Such a guarantee would be useful, as it would
allow me to do more optimisation of stored data.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: Peter Constable [mailto:email@example.com]
> Sent: Tuesday, November 25, 2003 6:04 PM
> To: firstname.lastname@example.org
> Subject: RE: numeric properties of Nl characters in the UCD
> Not all characters representing numbers are digits. Not all characters
> representing digits are decimal digits.
> What *cannot* happen is for a character to have different non-null
> values for the various number-related properties.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 05:57:53 EST