From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Wed Nov 26 2003 - 12:34:26 EST
On 26/11/2003 07:43, firstname.lastname@example.org wrote:
>In all I would rather ban all defective sequences, by enforcing the W3C
>character model. I dont' see much point for them. The only possible reason I
>can think of right now is to allow description of the character itself, though
>that would possibly best be done through an element that represents the concept
>of a Unicode character along the lines of <character codepoint="824" />.
Formally, as we discovered recently on this list, it is necessary to use
defective combining sequences to write some Khmer words correctly as
defined in TUS 4.0 p.282; for a sequence of combining characters
following ZWNJ is a defective combining sequence.
-- Peter Kirk email@example.com (personal) firstname.lastname@example.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Nov 26 2003 - 13:37:22 EST