From: Peter Kirk (peterkirk@qaya.org)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 10:19:05 EST
On 05/01/2004 05:53, Philippe Verdy wrote:
> ...
>
>Note that the name I gave just suggests its approximate look. It does not
>necessarily mean its is semantically correct. So of course, if the only use
>of
>this i with lower-right hook has a better traditional name, it should have a
>name that matches this tradition if it is ever encoded. But for now, in
>absence of this character in Unicode, the composition:
> <Latin small letter dotless-i><combining retroflex hook below>
>or
> <Latin capital letter I><combining retroflex hook below>
>is quite good to represent it, and it works with Turkish/Azeri case
>mappings.
>
>
>
Unfortunately in the same old alphabets the Turkish/Azeri case mappings
don't work with the normal I/i as these follow the normal western case
mappings.
-- Peter Kirk peter@qaya.org (personal) peterkirk@qaya.org (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 11:02:12 EST