From: Michael Everson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Mon Jan 05 2004 - 10:39:48 EST
At 07:27 -0800 2004-01-05, Peter Kirk wrote:
>If we are talking about U+0184/0185 (an inexact character name is
>not much help), yes, that is a sensible match, but in that case we
>need a note cf. for 01A3 that these are for Pan-Turkic Latin
>alphabets, and not just for Zhuang tones as the existing note
>Also, the reference glyphs seem to have an attachment on their left
>sides, more than a normal serif, which is confusing and makes them
>look as much like a Cyrillic hard sign as a soft sign. A soft sign
>should have symmetrical serifs, or no serif at all.
I know. It will help if we can show a Zhuang text without the weird
serifs; I've had my eye out for a while.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Jan 05 2004 - 11:26:10 EST