From: Chris Jacobs (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Jan 15 2004 - 12:27:48 EST
> > WHY THEN DISTRIBUTES THE KLI SUCH A BLATANTLY UNCONFORMANT FONT?
> You could have said that without vociferating so loudly. (Against the
> etiquette, no?)
In the KLIpIqaDmey font this indicates using the pIqaD letters. Lower case
are the Mandel letters.
> What is non conforming? The fact that the font uses PUAs?
Rather the fact that it does not.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Jan 15 2004 - 13:22:09 EST