From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Jan 30 2004 - 18:00:57 EST
On 30/01/2004 12:34, Michael Everson wrote:
> At 12:02 -0800 2004-01-30, Peter Kirk wrote:
>> Couldn't you just treat the small caps like the mathematical
>> alphanumeric symbols, as <font> compatibility variants of ordinary
>> capital letters - which is after all what they are?
> That is their origin. That is not how these letters are used.
Nor is that how mathematical alphanumeric symbols are used. But they are
still given compatibility and collation data as if they were. I am
simply looking for some consistency, and less confusion for the ordinary
user of the collation charts who shouldn't see these letters highlighted
at the top level, but rather hidden among a whole lot of other font
variants used only for special purposes.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Jan 30 2004 - 18:56:09 EST