From: Peter Constable (email@example.com)
Date: Thu Feb 19 2004 - 10:40:36 EST
> From: firstname.lastname@example.org [mailto:email@example.com]
> Of Michael Everson
> >Sorry, that doesn't cut it, IMO. You know all too well that "what
> >people need to encode" is open to lots of interpretations. When
> >someone comes along and says "we need to encode Devanagari ksha" or
> >"we need to encode ch", you, Michael Everson, will respond saying,
> >"No, we do not need to encode those things,"
> Because they can be represented in plain text already.
So, you have a principle for deciding about "ch"; do you have a
principle for deciding about technical notations?
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Feb 19 2004 - 11:28:28 EST