Fwd: Re: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705

From: brian@gael-image.com
Date: Tue Feb 17 2004 - 17:17:39 EST

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: (SC2WG2.609) New contribution N2705"

    I was mistaken about where these characters exist. I was actually referring to
    the "Spacing Modifier Letters" block.

    My point is that characters such as 02B0, 02B2, and 02E0 are already used in the
    same fashion as the newly proposed Indo-European characters. Therefore, it's
    not clear to me why there should be any objection to the latter.

    Quoting Philippe Verdy <verdy_p@wanadoo.fr>:

    > We don't need to exclude symbols or notations from Unicode, which already
    > defines a full "S" category for them (as well as "N" for numeric symbols).
    > So why do you seem to suggest that IPA should not be there and considered > as

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Feb 17 2004 - 18:36:44 EST