Re: LATIN SMALL LIGATURE CT

From: Adam Twardoch (list.adam@twardoch.com)
Date: Mon Mar 01 2004 - 04:53:16 EST

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Tajik alphabet code"

    ----- Original Message -----
    From: "Asmus Freytag" <asmusf@ix.netcom.com>

    > Ligatures in use in Fracktur are entirely missing. For example, ch is
    > a mandatory ligature there.

    It doesn't matter whether a ligature is "mandatory" or not. Ligatures should
    not be encoded _at all_, and these encoded in the Alphabetic Presentation
    Forms are an uncomfortable compromise, and exception.

    Adam



    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Mar 01 2004 - 05:28:18 EST