From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:00:39 EST
At 10:34 AM 3/18/2004, Michael Everson wrote:
>I think the ANARCHY SIGN is perfectly good, but I think it is a glyph
>variant of an existing character.
Just as 2117 and 24C5 are similar, but unrelated the *ANARCHY SIGN is not
the same as 24B6.
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Mar 18 2004 - 17:42:46 EST