From: Philippe Verdy (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sun Mar 28 2004 - 10:32:15 EST
From: "Asmus Freytag" <email@example.com>
> Variation selectors are not unassigned characters.
And must not be used after unassigned characters as well...
But can we use them after PUAs, to render specific variants of characters in
specialized fonts made for scripts without a current standard?
Or should we encode all these variants as plain PUAs as well?
I think for example about the 2 or 3 variants that exist for most of the 195
Mende-Kikakui syllables... (Of course we can encode all of them separately but
there may exist some rule to infer which variant to use, or some local
usages/preferences for the recognizable glyph).
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Mar 28 2004 - 11:11:36 EST