RE: Fixed Width Spaces

From: Mike Ayers ([email protected])
Date: Mon Apr 05 2004 - 20:07:40 EDT

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"

Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Doulos SIL (was: French typographic thin space)"
Maybe in reply to: Ernest Cline: "RE: Fixed Width Spaces"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]]On
> Behalf Of Peter Kirk
> Sent: Monday, April 05, 2004 3:09 PM

> Mike's nonsencical
> statements that all legal texts are necessarily highly marked up.

Now I'm certain that you are trolling. I made no such statement.

I did, however, possibly miss a word. "plain text Unicode" should
be "printed plain text Unicode", as the width of a space is basically
meaningless in cyberspace, but I thought that to be self evident.

/|/|ike

Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"
Previous message: Peter Constable: "RE: Doulos SIL (was: French typographic thin space)"
Maybe in reply to: Ernest Cline: "RE: Fixed Width Spaces"
Next in thread: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"
Reply: Peter Kirk: "Re: Fixed Width Spaces"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 05 2004 - 20:53:15 EDT