From: Asmus Freytag (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Thu Apr 08 2004 - 17:13:51 EDT
this is the kind of thing that you should report via
our error reporting form. Here on the open list, it's
liable to get lost (no-one owns excerpting issues from
The contact form can be found on our home page under
At 12:03 PM 4/8/2004, email@example.com wrote:
>Is there a difference between U+66F6 and U+3ADA?
>The newest UNIHAN.TXT file doesn't have a definition field for
>U+66F6. The glyphs in the Unicode 4.0 book appear identical
>for these two characters. One is placed with radical 72, the
>other with radical 73, although UNIHAN.TXT gives both as
>having radical 73.
>U+3ADA kIRGKangXi 0502.080
>U+66F6 kKangXi 0502.080
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Thu Apr 08 2004 - 18:20:54 EDT