From: Peter Kirk (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Apr 16 2004 - 04:24:20 EDT
On 15/04/2004 16:22, Philippe Verdy wrote:
>>There are also, including combining middle dots (most of these listed at
>>U+0387 GREEK ANO TELEIA
>wrong form? it's a small square, and is the greek semicolon, and is then
This should not be a small square; it should be identical to U+00B7 to
which it is canonically equivalent.
>>U+05BC HEBREW POINT DAGESH OR MAPIQ
>where would you position it according to the Catalan L letter which has a
>distinct directionality, and should not inherit of the complexity of the Hebrew
>Why isn't there even U+0307 COMBINING DOT BELOW or U+0323 COMBINING DOT ABOVE in
Surely U+05BC doesn't have inherent directionality? I thought that
combining characters took the directionality of their base characters.
I was only including middle height dots. The list of dots in other
positions in much longer - at least four others just in Hebrew.
I wasn't seriously suggesting any of these as suitable for Catalan,
except possibly for HYPHENATION POINT.
-- Peter Kirk firstname.lastname@example.org (personal) email@example.com (work) http://www.qaya.org/
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri Apr 16 2004 - 04:57:50 EDT