From: Joop Jagers (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Sat Apr 17 2004 - 06:18:33 EDT
In my view ano teleia should have the size and position of the upper dot
of the ":" glyph. Am I correct?
Alexandros Diamantidis wrote:
>* Asmus Freytag <email@example.com> [2004-04-16 11:28]:
>>weight. (See attached sample). If data is normalized, the appearance of ano
>>teleia will change (since 0387 will change into 00B7) and users will be
>Yes, I know - I've seen professionally published magazines with the
>wrong ano teleia glyph, bigger and lower than it should be. It was
>probably not even caused by normalization - I think most Greek keyboards
>produce 00B7 and not 0387.
>Since language-dependend glyph selection isn't very widespread for now,
>would it be too much to ask font designers to put a MIDDLE DOT glyph
>appropriate for Greek in fonts capable of displaying Greek text?
>That's a just a wish, BTW - I don't expect designers to do what I say
>just because I sent a message in a mailing list ;-)
-- Joop Jagers (Eindhoven, NL) \ \\ // / ( @ @ ) ----oOOO----(_)----OOOo-----
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 17 2004 - 06:48:51 EDT