Re: U+0140

From: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin (antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt)
Date: Sat Apr 17 2004 - 15:33:59 EDT

  • Next message: Anto'nio Martins-Tuva'lkin: "Re: U+0140"

    On 2004.04.16, 14:26, Ernest Cline <ernestcline@mindspring.com> wrote:

    >> From: Antoine Leca <Antoine10646@leca-marti.org>
    >>
    >> ... it is vastly more easy to keep the obvious unification, rather
    >> than trying to distort it and trying to make a conditional mapping,
    >> if Mathematics, · => U+00B7, if Catalan, · => U+2027, if NoSeQue, ·
    >> => some_other_random_middle_dot, etc.
    >
    > I don't see that as being any worse than the set of HYPHEN_MINUS,
    > HYPHEN, MINUS SIGN, etc.

    Or -- to bring this back to textual/orthographic widely used kludges
    in legation data vs. typographical correctness "from now on" -- than
    U+0027 : APOSTROPHE vs. U+02BC : MODIFIER LETTER APOSTROPHE...

    -- ____.
    António MARTINS-Tuválkin | ()|
    <antonio@tuvalkin.web.pt> |####|
    PT-1XXX-XXX LISBOA Não me invejo de quem tem |
    +351 934 821 700 carros, parelhas e montes |
    http://www.tuvalkin.web.pt/bandeira/ só me invejo de quem bebe |
    http://pagina.de/bandeiras/ a água em todas as fontes |

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sat Apr 17 2004 - 16:55:44 EDT