Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Michael Everson (
Date: Sun Apr 25 2004 - 18:28:30 EDT

  • Next message: Philippe Verdy: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"

    At 18:17 -0400 2004-04-25, Ernest Cline wrote:

    >So far all that has appeared has been meta-discussion of locales,
    >and a separate mailing list. Let's wait until we get some actual
    >discussion about locales themselves before making this judgement.
    >Once created, it will not be feasible to undo.

    No. No, Ernest. Locales do NOT have to do with the Unicode character
    set or with the processing of its characters, which is what this list
    is for. Locales is a whole huge other world, independent of character
    set, and needs to be on a separate list. I do NOT favour
    around waiting for the proof that people will argue about the big
    world of locales. I have been dealing with locales for a decade, when
    I began working in CEN/TC304.

    Michael Everson * * Everson Typography *  *

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Sun Apr 25 2004 - 18:59:48 EDT