From: Michael \(michka\) Kaplan (email@example.com)
Date: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 18:19:40 EDT
From: "Philippe Verdy" <firstname.lastname@example.org>
> > From: "Philippe Verdy" <email@example.com>
> Where did I discuss about DDK header files?
MSKLC does not do anything that the system does not do -- it generates
keyboard layout DLL based on the documented DDK interfaces. There are no
active or passive plans to change that method of generation in MSKLC (and I
am speaking here as the dev owner of the tool here, so you can probably
count on it <grin>).
<snip a bit>
> Some good examples are in the US International keyboard and in the
> French-English keyboard. They are quite easy to learn and allow entering
> lots of composed characters. Allowing multiple dead keys before the final
> character keystroke would seem a natural extension, also for Romanian
> This is also a solution that avoids adding too many precomposed glyphs on
> keycaps, and ease learning to use the layout.
If the Unicode way is done -- i.e. adding the base characters and the
combining diacritics separately will have the same number of keystrokes, and
will work across all characters (rather than just the ones with precomposed
NLS Collation/Locale/Keyboard Development
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 26 2004 - 19:03:02 EDT