Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Peter Kirk (
Date: Mon Apr 26 2004 - 19:38:22 EDT

  • Next message: Peter Kirk: "Re: SSP default ignorable characters, was: Variation selectors and vowel marks"

    On 26/04/2004 10:47, Rick McGowan wrote:

    >(As usual, this is all my own opinion, and does not reflect any official policy.)

    Really? Is it simply chance that this debate has ALL of the Unicode
    officers on one side and EVERYONE else who has contributed to the
    discussion on the other side? OK, the policy may be unofficial, but it
    does seem to be a coherent policy which is being pursued despite the
    preferences of the list membership as a whole.

    Peter Kirk (personal) (work)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Mon Apr 26 2004 - 20:11:51 EDT