Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?

From: Antoine Leca (Antoine10646@leca-marti.org)
Date: Tue Apr 27 2004 - 05:13:59 EDT

Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: Proposal to add 2 Romanian characters"

Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: SSP default ignorable characters, was: Variation selectors and vowel marks"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

On Tuesday, April 27, 2004 1:38 AM, Peter Kirk va escriure:

> Is it simply chance that this debate has ALL of the Unicode
> officers on one side and EVERYONE else who has contributed to the
> discussion on the other side?

Perhaps because the Unicode officers are so vociferous that the people (like
me) which are on the same side do not see any reason to add fuel to the
overraging fire?

Antoine

Next message: Raymond Mercier: "Re: Proposal to add 2 Romanian characters"
Previous message: Doug Ewell: "Re: SSP default ignorable characters, was: Variation selectors and vowel marks"
In reply to: Peter Kirk: "Re: [META] Should there be a separate public list for CLDR?"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Tue Apr 27 2004 - 06:15:14 EDT