Re: PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]

• Previous message: Dean Snyder: "PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• In reply to: Dean Snyder: "PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> At some point it can indeed become unrealistic, snobbish, self-serving,
> and even lazy to just casually toss out the "do-it-yourself" crumb.

Of course this depends on how easy doing-it-yourself is made. Anything that puts
a burden off the vendors and standardisers and onto the user puts the burden of
helping the user deal with that task back onto the vendors and standardisers.

-- 
Jon Hanna
<http://www.hackcraft.net/>
"…it has been truly said that hackers have even more words for
equipment failures than Yiddish has for obnoxious people." - jargon.txt

• Next message: Michael Everson: "New contribution"
• Previous message: Dean Snyder: "PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• In reply to: Dean Snyder: "PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• Next in thread: Kenneth Whistler: "Re: PUA as the Wild West [was: SSP default ignorable characters]"
• Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
• Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 10:50:46 EDT