RE: Croatian

From: Peter Constable (petercon@microsoft.com)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 10:57:16 EDT

Next message: Language Analysis Systems, Inc. Unicode list reader: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"

Previous message: Ernest Cline: "Non-decimal positional digits; was: Defined Private Use"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "Croatian"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: Croatian"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

> But then, what is that fuss for?

Fuss? I didn't think asking a question constituted a fuss :-)

The question behind my question is this: it has been deemed necessary at
least by some to tag e.g. Serbian content to indicate the script -- e.g.
"sr-Cyrl" vs. "sr-Latn". At the moment, I might only be anticipating
dealing with Croatian content in Latin script, but is there a potential
need for Cyrillic out there that means that I should perhaps be tagging
my current Croatian data to indicate that the script is Latin?

The responses so far haven't indicated a resounding yes, but also
haven't given a decisive no. (I'm not surprised.)

Peter

Peter Constable
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division

Next message: Language Analysis Systems, Inc. Unicode list reader: "RE: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"
Previous message: Ernest Cline: "Non-decimal positional digits; was: Defined Private Use"
Maybe in reply to: Peter Constable: "Croatian"
Next in thread: Radovan Garabik: "Re: Croatian"
Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ] [ attachment ]
Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 11:53:54 EDT