From: Peter Constable (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 10:57:16 EDT
> But then, what is that fuss for?
Fuss? I didn't think asking a question constituted a fuss :-)
The question behind my question is this: it has been deemed necessary at
least by some to tag e.g. Serbian content to indicate the script -- e.g.
"sr-Cyrl" vs. "sr-Latn". At the moment, I might only be anticipating
dealing with Croatian content in Latin script, but is there a potential
need for Cyrillic out there that means that I should perhaps be tagging
my current Croatian data to indicate that the script is Latin?
The responses so far haven't indicated a resounding yes, but also
haven't given a decisive no. (I'm not surprised.)
Globalization Infrastructure and Font Technologies
Microsoft Windows Division
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 11:53:54 EDT