Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters

From: Peter Kirk (
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 16:20:47 EDT

  • Next message: John Hudson: "Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters"

    On 28/04/2004 12:00, Ernest Cline wrote:

    > ...
    >There will always be scripts that Unicode will not support, either because
    >they are constructed scripts with no real use, rare or ancient scripts that
    >lack sufficient examples to determine how the script should be encoded,
    >or are picture fonts. This last we can discount, because the existing
    >private use area supports them adequately. ...

    Don't count on it. The PUA as Ken envisages it doesn't provide adequate
    support for anything at all.

    Peter Kirk (personal) (work)

    This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 17:05:39 EDT