From: John Hudson (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Date: Wed Apr 28 2004 - 16:19:00 EDT
Philippe Verdy wrote:
> Interesting point. This would be an argument for the developement (out of
> Unicode) of some standard technical solutions to exchange these private
> conventions on PUA usage, including exchange of character properties, etc...
> Why not then within fonts -- namely in Opentype tables for fonts built with
> these PUA assignments?
Fonts are collections of glyphs. It is important to keep this in mind when proposing that,
somehow, character properties be included in fonts.
The only interaction between glyphs in a font and character codes in text is via mapping
(which is done either internally or externally, depending on the font format). Fonts do
not contain any character information other than which glyphs corrrespond to which
characters. All other information in the font is glyph-centric; e.g. ligature and other
substitution lookups map glyphs to glyphs, not characters to glyphs. Trying to introduce
character properties into such a glyph-centric architecture would be, at best, an awkward fit.
-- Tiro Typeworks www.tiro.com Vancouver, BC email@example.com I often play against man, God says, but it is he who wants to lose, the idiot, and it is I who want him to win. And I succeed sometimes In making him win. - Charles Peguy
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Wed Apr 28 2004 - 17:06:41 EDT