From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Fri Apr 30 2004 - 23:12:19 CST
At 17:31 -0700 2004-04-30, Mark Davis wrote:
>I find myself in agreement with Asmus on this. When reading
>Michael's original proposal, it seemed fairly straightforward; but
>it is now unclear to me why this necessarily needs to be encoded as
>a different script than Hebrew.
Then you have not been reading all the arguments carefully enough,
Mark. Historical principles HAVE informed and DO inform what is
encoded in the Unicode Standard.
Your "analogy" with Aldus is specious at best.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT