From: Michael Everson (email@example.com)
Date: Sat May 01 2004 - 12:42:38 CST
At 10:36 -0700 2004-05-01, Peter Kirk wrote:
>This pedagogical usage is not in plain text, or at least plain text
>usage has not been demonstrated. I think I asked before and didn't
>receive an answer: should Unicode encode a script whose ONLY
>demonstrated usage is in alphabet charts? I think the answer is not,
>because essentially these charts are graphics of glyphs, not text.
Perhaps if you would look at the proposal you would see the
demonstrated use of the script given in the figures there.
-- Michael Everson * * Everson Typography * * http://www.evertype.com
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT