Re: Defined Private Use was: SSP default ignorable characters

From: Chris Jacobs (
Date: Sun May 02 2004 - 20:29:31 CDT

> Still it seems legitimate to mark the font explicitly with the private
> convention it is supposed to support. For example a font containing glyphs
> mapped to PUAs assigned in the 2003 version of the ConScript PUA registry
> could
> be marked as such by including a trace of this private usage agreement.
> Without
> it, nothing will indicate explicitly in the font for which characters its
> internal PUA bindings were intented.

I think this is not needed.

If a font has a trace to its copyright owner then it seems to me reasonable
to suppose the copyright owner is the one to consult when difficulties arise
about its PUA conventions.

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT