From: John Cowan (email@example.com)
Date: Mon May 03 2004 - 09:50:26 CDT
Michael Everson scripsit:
> It is false to suggest that fully-pointed Hebrew text can be rendered
> in Phoenician script and that this is perfectly acceptable to any
> Hebrew reader
Of course it is.
> as would be the case for ordinary font change).
Not all font changes are acceptable. Give me a book, any book,
set in Magnificat, or Stop, and I'll hand you back a pile of
> I have referred to Latin font hacks as well as Hebrew ones. That one
> got ignored, of course, because it shows the Hebrew font-hack argument
> to be flimsy.
It's not about font hacks. It's about structural identity.
> And frankly, I don't consider that Snyder or Kirk or Cowan speak for
> the Semiticist community as they would have us think.
I make no such claim, and it's disingenuous of you to say that I do.
> Square Hebrew as encoded in the Unicode Standard is a beast unto
> itself. John Cowan's wish for a generic 22-letter West Semitic Abjad
> may be all very well and good, but Hebrew is much more than that,
> and it is not sensible to pretend that it isn't.
-- "They tried to pierce your heart John Cowan with a Morgul-knife that remains in the http://www.ccil.org/~cowan wound. If they had succeeded, you would http://www.reutershealth.com become a wraith under the domination of the Dark Lord." --Gandalf
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT