Re: New contribution

From: Patrick Andries (
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 14:16:56 CDT

Christian Cooke a écrit :

> Surely a cipher is by definition "after the event", i.e. there must be
> the parent script before the child. Does it not follow that, by John's
> reasoning, if one is no more than a cipher of the other then it is
> Hebrew that is the cipher and so the only way Phoenician and Hebrew
> can be unified (a suggestion you'll have to assume is suitably
> showered with smileys :-) is for the latter to be deprecated and the
> former encoded as the /real/ parent script?

What is so important about genealogy ?

P. A. (immunity of the ill-informed also requested)

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT