From: Patrick Andries (Patrick.Andries@xcential.com)
Date: Tue May 04 2004 - 15:27:39 CDT
Patrick Andries a écrit :
> Christian Cooke a écrit :
>> Surely a cipher is by definition "after the event", i.e. there must
>> be the parent script before the child. Does it not follow that, by
>> John's reasoning, if one is no more than a cipher of the other then
>> it is Hebrew that is the cipher and so the only way Phoenician and
>> Hebrew can be unified (a suggestion you'll have to assume is suitably
>> showered with smileys :-) is for the latter to be deprecated and the
>> former encoded as the /real/ parent script?
> What is so important about genealogy ?
Let me precise this : what is so important whether we encode the father
or one of the sons ?
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:25 CDT