Re: Proposal to add QAMATS QATAN to the BMP of the UCS

From: Philippe Verdy (
Date: Wed May 05 2004 - 13:15:47 CDT

From: "Peter Constable" <>
> I would probably leave the value at 220. That is what all of the Hebrew
> vowel points should have been, IMO. Though getting one right doesn't
> make a huge difference -- people are still going to be using CGJ to
> preserve particular sequences in the cases this will most likely be
> needed.

I note that the definition of combining sequences in TUS 4.0.1 was updated to
include ZWJ and ZWNJ, but still not CGJ, in the middle or at end of a combining
sequence. This is shown in the list of changes. Has there been an agreement made
to accept CGJ too? Or is this question in the decision pipe for a later vote
during some next UTC meeting?

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.1.5 : Fri May 07 2004 - 18:45:26 CDT